tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5847904405428185680.post3853747028167795644..comments2024-02-01T00:05:24.629-08:00Comments on Tropico Station: THE Glendale Blog: The LA Times Has No Idea Where Glendale IsUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5847904405428185680.post-54846836137116777872009-02-08T00:17:00.000-08:002009-02-08T00:17:00.000-08:00Part of the confusion may be that Best Buy itself ...Part of the confusion may be that Best Buy itself refers to the Atwater Village location as the Glendale store. Check out the Store Locator at bestbuy.com.Gerardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06393108805283365639noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5847904405428185680.post-78072738019096564412009-02-06T08:59:00.000-08:002009-02-06T08:59:00.000-08:00LAT doesn't have to know a thing about Atwater Vil...LAT doesn't have to know a thing about Atwater Village or any of the other 160+ neighborhoods. It's not the Atwater Village Times, after all. But you'd think they'd know where the Los Angeles city limits are. There are signs. And it's in the freeking name of the paper.<BR/><BR/>- <A HREF="http://atwater-village.blogspot.com" REL="nofollow">AVN</A>AVNhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11204716776306117623noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5847904405428185680.post-75434374025433662522009-01-26T10:17:00.000-08:002009-01-26T10:17:00.000-08:00Actually, we got a pretty good laugh out of the La...Actually, we got a pretty good laugh out of the Lazarus article since the Best Buy is pretty much next door to the Toys R Us on Los Feliz, so we seriously doubt that the thief "drove" from one to the other. Guess you can't expect too much research or in-house knowledge given all the lay-offs at the Times.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5847904405428185680.post-47116208873299183082009-01-26T09:11:00.000-08:002009-01-26T09:11:00.000-08:00Actually, this may have more to do with the fact t...Actually, this may have more to do with the fact that the Times defines its own neighborhood boundaries.<BR/><BR/>via curbedLA: http://la.curbed.com/archives/2009/01/los_angeles_times_will_do_the_unthinkable.phpThttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14049960897355897687noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5847904405428185680.post-17341598318031591382009-01-26T09:08:00.000-08:002009-01-26T09:08:00.000-08:00This comment has been removed by the author.Thttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14049960897355897687noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5847904405428185680.post-31345081239134399632009-01-26T00:27:00.000-08:002009-01-26T00:27:00.000-08:00I went with a Glendale oriented headline, but a mo...I went with a Glendale oriented headline, but a more accurate headline would indeed be "LAT Has No Idea Where Atwater Village Is".<BR/><BR/>"Los Angeles Times Can't Find Los Angeles On A Map" also has a nice ring to it.Scotthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01395219854435584426noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5847904405428185680.post-60654784230898478312009-01-26T00:18:00.000-08:002009-01-26T00:18:00.000-08:00Dude. Shut it. This has NOTHING to do with the LAT...Dude. Shut it. <BR/><BR/>This has NOTHING to do with the LAT not knowing what's up with Glendale and EVERYTHING to do with LAT and most news organizations having NO IDEA where Atwater Village is, or in many cases, that it even exists. <BR/><BR/>I'm with you on the rage part, but I think it has more to do with Atwater Village's profile, than Glendale's.<BR/><BR/>Anyway...I like it here. Keep it up.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com